Crack-Like Features
Crack-Like Feature
Crack-like feature is a screening label for indications that may represent cracking, crack colonies, seam-related cracking, or another linear threat requiring specialized review and careful data qualification.
Browse by threat category, topic, or keyword
A structured reference for evaluating pipeline defects and integrity conditions.
This tool provides structured guidance for evaluating pipeline defects and integrity conditions. It is designed to support engineering thinking, data collection, and early-stage assessment.
It does not replace professional engineering judgment, operator procedures, or regulatory requirements.
Beta notice: This tool is an active development (beta) version. Content, structure, and guidance may change over time and may contain errors or incomplete information. Users should not rely on this tool as a final or authoritative source and should apply professional engineering judgment and applicable procedures.
Common starting points during integrity review
8 topics filtered by tag "screening"
Crack-Like Features
Crack-like feature is a screening label for indications that may represent cracking, crack colonies, seam-related cracking, or another linear threat requiring specialized review and careful data qualification.
Data Quality / ILI Review
Data quality and ILI review is the workflow used to decide whether the inspection data are trustworthy enough to support a real engineering decision. In practice this means checking whether the reported feature, location, sizing, and classification are still inside the tool's qualified capability and whether the tool call is unified with field reality, prior runs, weld alignment, and any excavation history.
Dents
Dent guidance starts with geometric deformation but quickly moves into context: where the dent sits, whether it interacts with other threats, and whether shape alone understates the concern.
Metal Loss
General metal loss is the starting point for corrosion review when wall loss is reported but the practical question is still whether the feature is isolated, interacting, growing, or part of a broader integrity mechanism.
Girth Weld / Fabrication Issues
Girth weld concern helps organize review when an anomaly is on or near a girth weld and the engineer needs to understand whether weld interaction changes significance, data confidence, or next actions.
Interaction Issues
Interacting metal loss is the review path used when multiple nearby corrosion features could combine into a more severe effective condition than any single listed anomaly suggests.
Metal Loss
Internal corrosion review is the workflow for metal loss that may be driven by the product stream, water hold-up, solids, deposits, flow disturbances, dead legs, drips, or other service-related internal conditions rather than outside environment alone.
Data Quality / ILI Review
Unknown or unclassified feature guidance is for anomalies that cannot yet be confidently routed into a defect mechanism or engineering workflow because the data are incomplete, conflicting, or ambiguous.